|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 23:33:00 -
[1]
I agree nanos are completely overpowered. Also, rooks and falcons are overpowered. I had 2 battleships with uberleet max skilled pilots in a gang today and this rook (you know the noncloaking one!!!) totally got tackled by my buddy and I while we were gatecamping in our Megathrons. Only problem is, that he JAMMED US BOTH AND RAN OFF! Seriously, how fair is that CCP?
It's not fair that I should have to setup my ship in a certain way to be able to not get jammed. I should be able to armor OR shield tank my megathron and still deal with pesky jammers and nanos. They are both way overpowered.
I like all the ops suggestions. Make nanos way more expensive and introduce stacking penalties. There aren't any stacking penalties on speed mods now, someone in jita told me so. Also, cloaks should be way more expensive, cause they like let you get away way to easily. Oh, and jammers should all be more expensive, ofc. How fair is it that we should have all these modules in game that let you run away? Well except stabs, those are good, because you need those on setups when you're travelling.
PVP would get way better if ccp made these changes. To the OP, i'm so glad you brought these issues to the developers attention. I'm just tired of people running away and all this thinking I have to do before undocking. pvp will be much more fun the less of it I have to do. -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 23:36:00 -
[2]
oh and yeah, don't listen to euriti, cause he's a noob who can't fly t2 ships. So what if he says he's actually got a 'strategy' or something that can overcome nanos? He's lying. There's nothing that can be done to stop this menance except for the devs nerfing them into the ground. I'm can't wait until bigger ships always beat littler ships so I can kill this euriti idiot repeatedly with my uberpest. -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.17 23:42:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Miss Stella Euriti, stop posting, you cant even fly a battleship. How can you suggest a solution to a problem when all you fly is t1 crusiers? Stop pretending to be knowledgeable when all you know is blob/bait.
YES! NANOS CAN BE KILLED! Except it requires 2-3 ships to kill 1 cruiser. Thats wrong and imbalanced. LIKE I SAID!!! PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE TO EITHER FIGHT OR RUN! BUT NOT BOTH! Yes, rails can track a nano.. so can your sentry drones, but theres a difference between shooting and killing a ship.
The whole game shouldnt morph around nanos...
Oh and for the record, I'm laughing my butt off at how awful your arguement is. I really hope for your sake (and everyone else near you in the genepool) that you're joking.
Don't worry though, your high SP will make your point valid, even if your post suggests you can barely control your bodily functions. -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.18 23:05:00 -
[4]
guys. seriously.
I have eleventy billion kills (just check battleclinc ofc) therefore when i say nanos are overpowered, you must instantly feel compelled to believe me and know in your heart that what i say is true. That math stuff is pretty hard, though so I don't wanna get into it. They are overpowered. There I said it again. Believe me now? Well until you do, I guess I'll just keep making threads like this that make people capable of forming opinions backed by facts and logic either shudder at my sheer stupidity and lose faith in humanity or laugh uncontrollably.
I can keep making these threads all day long. You say that if I put even an ounce of effort towards firing some syapses in the old rusty noggin I could actually come up with a way to beat/drive off/BE 100% SAFE FROM ANY 'NANO' GANG?! Well that might be the case, but you're assuming there are any neural pathways left up there (there aren't).
Anyway, i'm going back to my drake gang where I'll try to kill these darn nanos. I'm training up my missile skills even higher in the hope that having level 5 in warhead upgrades will finally let me kill this darn vaga. It just goes so fast and blows up all my gangmates drakes when it just looks at them! NO FAIR! -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.18 23:07:00 -
[5]
oh crap. I just lost my drake to a buncha noobs in their nano gang. NERF PLS CCP!
 -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.18 23:19:00 -
[6]
Originally by: FORD ESC0RT had entire fleet of ships trying to catch a nano typhoon with smartbombs. he killed off half our fleet and ran away.
That's exactly what I'm saying. There is absolutely NO WAY to counter this CCP!!! We all chased him and webbed him and then got within 5.5km of him. I know webs go to 10km (13km t2 + heat) but we had to get like real close and stuff, cause you know we're excited. -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.18 23:20:00 -
[7]
quite frankly i'm disappointed that CCP would make a ship/combat type that even a 20 man t1 frigate gang couldn't counter.
 -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.19 20:30:00 -
[8]
guys, eve is being destroyed by nano ships.
yesterday I had a 10 man camp with huginns and sensor boosters. This 12km/s interceptor jumped in and just nanoed off. Seriously, someone tell me how I can kill this ship with a single ship of my own, just like how eve was meant to be played. Also this rapier ran right past our camp, even though we tried to decloak him, it's gonna be unbalanced as I can't kill it by myself. Oh and this carrier came out of warp on the gate, but my drake couldn't kill it alone. Nerf pls.

Podruski/Sella,
You realize I haven't made any sort of number/logic based arguments because there really isn't any need to? Euriti already pointed out how wrong you are and you ignored him. You're the terminally stupid troll here. You bring no numbers, no evidence other than person anecdotes and why you 'feel' something is unbalanced. You make as logical an argument as a village idiot.
When euriti makes good points, you slag him as not having a valid opinion because he's new/can't fly nano hacs. Could you possibly get more vain/thick headed/stupid? No. I really doubt you could. Everytime I get upset that the Devs don't actually head players opinions more then they already do, I realize they have to sort through pages and pages of rants such as this created by unintelligable morons.
I'm gonna keep posting here mocking your horrible ideas and complete lack of logic because I think other people have the 'facts' of the matter pretty well covered. Maybe you should spend less time insulting people you are talking to and construct a reasonable/valid opinion? I doubt you will. I would ask you stop posting, but that's both rude and probably a lost cause. I only ask you not to reproduce. I feel that one will take care of itself, though.  -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 07:18:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Kery Syander on 20/06/2008 07:18:26
Originally by: Caelum Dominus Edited by: Caelum Dominus on 20/06/2008 06:02:26
Originally by: DeadDuck The important part is that game mechanics allow a BS to reach 17K m/s... dont you think that might be a "bit" to much? 
You're full of ****.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Caelum/Machariel_-_Test%5B2%5D.jpg
Even with a maxed-skilled Claymore, it cannot exceed 14km/s. Do you bunch really expect anyone to take you seriously when you cannot even present facts that are remotely trustworthy?

eft > deadduck
don't you think you exaggerated a "bit" too much?

anywho nanos are fine. Stop being such a complete single minded bafoon and you might realize that (talking to podruski here). FYI, my cat may have less SP than you, but she's probably better at EVE then you. -----
|

Kery Syander
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.20 07:27:00 -
[10]
viper****zle? in the work shop? oh wait, this isn't this workshop!?!?! am I drunk or are people stammering about nanos and their overpoweredness in eve-general again?
 -----
|
|
|
|
|